Health and Safety Consultant for Nelson, Richmond and Blenheim

Company and director fined for incident that left a man a tetraplegic

Home  >>  Uncategorized  >>  Company and director fined for incident that left a man a tetraplegic

Company and director fined for incident that left a man a tetraplegic

On May 23, 2017, Posted by , In Uncategorized, With No Comments

WorkSafe NZ media release, 22 May 2017 – Worksafe Smart, Health and Safety Consultant for the Nelson, Richmond and Blenheim region. Health and Safety policies, manuals, management plans, training, reviews, audits, advice and more.

Disregard for employee health and safety left a worker a tetraplegic, and resulted in a total of $386,300 in fines and reparation for a horticultural company and its director in the Pukekohe District Court today.

Wai Shing Ltd and its director Franklin Wai Shing were each charged under section 6 of the Health and Safety in Employment Act (1992) for failing to take all practicable steps to ensure the safety of its employee while at work. This followed an incident that left an employee paralysed from the neck down and requiring 24-hour care.

The victim lay undiscovered and unable to move for several hours after he was struck on the back of the neck by part of a harvester – used to collect pumpkin and squash – while he unloaded it from a truck in a remote location.

“Wai Shing Ltd hadn’t followed basic health and safety management practices such as understanding and managing risks associated with using the harvester, despite using it since 1996,” said WorkSafe General Manager Operations and Specialist Services, Brett Murray.

“In addition, the victim was inadequately trained in its use or transport and the company had no emergency plan to cover when a person is injured while working alone,” Mr Murray said.

The company was also charged under sections 25 and 26 after it failed in its duty to notify WorkSafe after the incident, disturbed the incident scene and continued using the harvester that injured the worker.

It also failed to mention the incident two weeks later when WorkSafe inspectors visited on an unrelated matter. WorkSafe was only alerted to the incident nearly six months later by the victim’s wife.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *